Resolves the wayfinder research question: unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF ships UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf (17.6GB) directly. Documents VRAM footprint on 32GB RDNA4 (R9700/gfx1201) at 32K and 128K context via llama.cpp ROCm/HIP. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.1 KiB
Research: Unsloth dynamic 4-bit GGUF for Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B
Question: Does a UD-Q4_K_XL (or equivalent Unsloth dynamic) GGUF quant of
Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B exist? If not, what's the closest tool-call-safe
alternative, and what's the VRAM footprint on a 32GB RDNA4 card
(AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700, gfx1201) via llama.cpp ROCm/HIP, at 32K and 128K
context?
Answer: Yes, it exists. unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF on Hugging Face
contains Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf (17.6 GB), Unsloth's Dynamic v3.0
4-bit "XL" quant that keeps higher precision on attention/critical layers.
This is the recommended download — no need to fall back to AWQ or plain
Q4_K_M.
Model identity (context)
Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B is a real, current model — released 2026-08-14 by
Alibaba's Qwen team (Apache 2.0), the successor to Qwen3.6-27B. It's a dense
27B hybrid model: 64 layers, full_attention_interval: 4, meaning only 16
of 64 layers are standard full-attention (KV-caching) layers; the other 48
are Gated DeltaNet linear-attention layers whose state is fixed-size
regardless of context length. hidden_size=5120, num_attention_heads=24,
num_key_value_heads=4 (GQA), head_dim=256, native context 262,144 tokens
(YaRN-extensible to 1M). It's natively multimodal (vision + video) via a
separate mmproj file.
Source: Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B model card,
Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B config.json,
QwenLM/Qwen3.8 GitHub repo.
Recommended repo / file
- Repo:
unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF - File:
Qwen3.8-27B-UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf— 17.6 GB - Optional vision projector (only needed for image/video input):
mmproj-BF16.gguf(931 MB) ormmproj-F16.gguf(928 MB)
Confirmed directly from the repo's file tree (primary source, fetched from
the HF repo page itself):
unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF/tree/main.
The repo also ships UD-Q4_K_M (16.5 GB), UD-Q4_K_S (15.4 GB), and other
Dynamic v3.0 sizes (IQ1 through Q8_K_XL), but UD-Q4_K_XL is the one that
matches the "dynamic 4-bit XL" spec in the ticket and gives the best
accuracy/size tradeoff at 4-bit — Unsloth's own docs name it as the
recommended default for this model.
Source: Unsloth docs — Qwen3.8 how-to-run page
("Unsloth recommends UD-Q4_K_XL as the primary quantization... 4-bit quants
work on 16-19GB VRAM").
Why prefer this over plain Q4_K_M/AWQ for tool-calling fidelity: Unsloth's
Dynamic v3.0 quantization selectively keeps higher bit-width on
attention/critical layers rather than uniformly quantizing everything, and
Unsloth's own model-card notes call out improved "tool calling: improved
parsing [of] nested objects to make tools succeed more" for this quant
family. Since a dynamic XL quant is directly available, there was no need to
fall back to evaluating AWQ alternatives.
Confidence note: The repo tree listing and file sizes were fetched directly from the Hugging Face page (primary source) and are high confidence. I did not download and independently checksum the file. The "improved tool calling" claim comes from Unsloth's own docs page (primary, first-party), not an independent benchmark — treat it as a vendor claim, not independently verified.
ModelScope / other sources checked
Search results also surfaced Qwen/Qwen3.8-27B mirrored patterns typical of
ModelScope + HF dual-publishing (per the QwenLM GitHub repo, which states
new releases go out on "Hugging Face and ModelScope" simultaneously), and a
non-Unsloth GGUF from bartowski/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF (imatrix-calibrated,
includes tool-calling/reasoning conversations in the calibration corpus) as
a secondary alternative if the Unsloth repo were ever unavailable. I did not
deep-dive ModelScope's page directly (Unsloth's HF repo already answers the
question), so treat the ModelScope-mirror claim as unconfirmed —
inferred from the GitHub repo's release notes rather than fetched directly
from modelscope.cn.
VRAM footprint on a 32GB RDNA4 card (R9700, gfx1201) via llama.cpp ROCm/HIP
Weights: 17.6 GB (UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf, fits entirely on-GPU on a 32GB card).
KV cache: Because only 16 of 64 layers are standard full-attention (GQA: 4 KV heads × 256 head_dim), the KV cache scales with just those 16 layers — the other 48 Gated-DeltaNet layers carry a fixed, context-length-independent recurrent state (order tens of MB total, negligible next to the attention KV cache).
Per-token KV cache (fp16, both K and V, 16 full-attn layers):
16 layers × 2 (K+V) × 4 kv_heads × 256 head_dim × 2 bytes = 64 KiB/token
| Context | KV cache (fp16) | Weights | Weights + KV cache | Headroom on 32GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32K tokens | ~2.0 GB | 17.6 GB | ~19.6 GB | ~12 GB free (compute buffer, batch, overhead) |
| 128K tokens | ~8.0 GB | 17.6 GB | ~25.6 GB | ~6 GB free — comfortable but tighter |
Both fit on a 32GB card with room to spare. If more headroom is wanted at
128K (e.g., for larger batch/ubatch or multiple parallel sequences),
quantizing the KV cache to Q8_0 in llama.cpp (--cache-type-k q8_0 --cache-type-v q8_0) roughly halves the cache to ~4 GB, bringing the 128K
total to ~21.6 GB.
Sanity check against a third-party source: a blog doing the same math independently states the full 262,144-token native context costs "about 17GB of KV cache" for this hybrid architecture. My formula gives 262,144 × 64 KiB ≈ 16.0 GB, consistent with that figure. Source: WebSearch summary citing "Qwen3.8-27B VRAM/KV-cache math" blog (secondary source, used only as a cross-check on the arithmetic, not as a primary claim).
ROCm/HIP + gfx1201 support: ROCm 7.2 added official gfx1201 support
(some report 7.1.1 working via HSA_OVERRIDE_GFX_VERSION); llama.cpp builds
with -DGGML_HIP=ON -DCMAKE_HIP_ARCHITECTURES=gfx1201. Note: community
reports say the Vulkan backend is currently ~23% faster than ROCm/HIP on
gfx1201 for token generation, and the HIP backend has a known issue keeping
the GPU at elevated clocks/power after idle. These are performance/operational
notes, not blockers for fitting the model in VRAM.
Sources: tlee933/llama.cpp-rdna4-gfx1201 GitHub,
ggml-org/llama.cpp discussion #20881 (R9700 ROCm),
ggml-org/llama.cpp discussion #15021 (ROCm perf).
Confidence note: these ROCm/gfx1201 specifics come from secondary
(community) sources, not AMD's or ggml-org's official docs directly fetched
— treat performance numbers as indicative, not guaranteed.
Bottom line for the wayfinder map
- Use
unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF, fileQwen3.8-27B-UD-Q4_K_XL.gguf(17.6 GB). - Fits comfortably on the 32GB R9700 at both 32K context (~19.6 GB total) and 128K context (~25.6 GB total, or ~21.6 GB with q8_0 KV cache).
- Build llama.cpp with ROCm/HIP targeting
gfx1201; Vulkan is a viable faster alternative backend if HIP's idle-power quirk is a problem.